Are Jews still Jews whether they accept Jesus as Messiah or not? Yes.

Are Gentiles Jews after they become “adopted” (i.e., “grafted in”) to God’s family by the Holy Spirit through Jesus as Savior? No.

Will we all be speaking Hebrew when we get to heaven? There is no reason to believe that according to Scripture.

These questions are not supposed to be difficult, but due to the rise of domestic ‘Hebrew Roots’ cults many American Christians are confused about the Jews. Here are some simple verses that should clear up the confusion.

MY NAME IS CALVIN (TRACE) MCNUTT AND THIS IS MY STORY ...

I WAS BORN IN 1963 TO A CATHOLIC FAMILY AND WAS RAISED CATHOLIC ...IT SEEMS LIKE I’VE ALWAYS HAD SOME KIND OF CONNECTION WITH THE LORD. ...AS A SMALL BOY ABOUT 5 YEARS OLD, I WOULD SEE THE CLASSIC MOVIE "KING OF KINGS" AND I WOULD CRY AND CRY OVER THE CRUCIFIXION SCENE NOT REALLY KNOWING WHY ..YET IT AFFECTED ME GREATLY...AS I GREW OLDER I WAS MOVED TO FLORIDA AT THE AGE OF 9 FROM MICHIGAN WHERE I WAS BORN...I STARTED TO EXPERIENCE REJECTION AT THAT POINT IN MIDDLE SCHOOL ...FOR SOME REASON I WAS NOT ACCEPTED BY OTHER BOYS MY AGE ...THERE WAS SOMETHING DIFFERENT ABOUT ME THAT THEY NOTICED...IT WAS THEN I WAS FIRST CALLED A "FAG"...AT THAT EARLY OF AN AGE WE HAVE NO SEXUAL IDENTITY YET ...BUT THE OTHER BOYS NEW SOMETHING WAS ODD...THIS STARTED A TORTURE FILLED CHILDHOOD OF REJECTION AND ABUSE...I WAS CONSTANTLY BEATEN AND HUMILIATED BY OTHER BOYS ...I HAD NO FRIENDS WHAT SO EVER FROM THE AGE OF 9 TO ABOUT 16.

Carl Jung said Jews were different from other people and needed to be dressed up in different clothes, because otherwise we mistook them for people like ourselves. "What were the Jews doing in the desert for 40 years, eating sand? Of course they were, feeding off other people's crops until they moved on." He was so jealous of the Jews. He was said to be a Nazi and then "not a Nazi in the strongest sense."

[The Aryan Christ, 274-275]

Carl Jung on Christians: "With me nobody has his place who is in the church. I am for those who are out of the church."

Carl Jung on Jews: "You know, I would never like to have children from a person who has Jewish blood."

[The Aryan Christ, 275, 278 ]

http://lightingtheway.blogspot.com/2010/07/quoting-carl-jung.html

It has been 477 years since 1533; the year Henry VIII divorced his first wife, Spanish Catholic Catherine of Aragon, in order to marry Anne Boleyn. The respected historian, Merle d’Aubigne, places Henry’s divorce in its larger context,

“The conquest of Christian Britain by the papacy occupied all the seventh century…The sixteenth was the counterpart of the seventh. The struggle which England then had to sustain, in order to free herself from the power that had enslaved her during nine hundred years was…the positive work of the Reformation—that which consisted in recovering the truth and life so long lost….As regards the negative work—the struggle with the popedom…the main point in this contest was not the divorce (which was only the occasion) but the contest itself and its important consequences. The divorce of Henry Tudor and Catherine of Aragon is a secondary event; but the divorce of England and the popedom is a primary event, one of the great watersheds of history…” [1]

Henry VIII wanted a church that would give him his desired divorce. He also wanted financial freedom from the Church of Rome. However in 1529 Catholic Cardinal Wolsey with his clergy wielded great power in England so as to challenge even Henry himself. Consequently it became Henry’s plan to release the clergy from the Pontiff and attach it to the crown. But this could not be accomplished through a simple act of royal authority because of constitutional governmental principles which had already been established. As a result, the clergy had to free itself from its bondage to Papal Rome. [2] Providentially, William Tyndale had just finished translating the New Testament into English and by 1526 Hanseatic merchants from Antwerp were importing it surreptitiously into England where it was becoming widely read. Thus was England being prepared to throw off the yoke of Papal Rome to attain both the liberty to worship biblically and the freedom to live without fear from a tyrannical monarch. [3]

Words to Live By

A Guide for the Merely Christian

By C.S. Lewis and Edited by Paul F. Ford

An evaluation of the words of C.S. Lewis [Part 2]

By Charisse Graves

             Part 1 of my evaluation focused on Mr. Lewis’ low view of objective truth as contained in God’s revealed word through the Bible, and how the subversion of the authority of Scripture leads into great error.  Mr. Lewis’ poor theology is a result of a lack of biblical understanding and his failure to use Scripture appropriately. The predictable outcome of his errant ideas is the breaking down of the walls of primary doctrines. Such a breakdown leads naturally to Ecumenicalism. This article is primarily addressing a major philosophy that shaped Mr. Lewis’ world and life view, which is subjective spirituality. This philosophy is in direct opposition to objective truth, which would be a reliance on the Bible as “the only infallible rule of faith and practice”, according to the Reformers. This piece is from The Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis, Volume III:

(Quotes from The Jung Cult by Richard Noll)

Jung believed he was a god. “Psychoanalysis became the new salvation of the world…Jung’s interest in spiritualism gave him ample experience of how one may deliberately enter a dissociative state or trance that allowed such automatisms as automatic handwriting or even alternate personalities to emerge. Jung had observed this at séances, and indeed his entire mother’s side of the family…seemed to have regularly engaged in discourse with spirits. Jung’s first encounter with the feminine entity he later called the anima seems to have begun with his use of such mediumistic techniques.” (p. 202)